Featured Contests

    WIN TICKETS TO SEE LORDE AT THE BARCLAYS IN 2018

    BLI’s welcomes Lorde: Melodrama World Tour to The Barclays Center on April 4th 2018.

    • Enter For A Pair Of Tickets!

    WIN TICKETS TO SEE ENRIQUE IGLESIAS AND PITBULL!

    Enrique Iglesias and Pitbull are making their way to MSG for two HUGE shows June 30th and July 1st.

    • Score Your Way In!

    What's Happening

    THE COOPER LAWRENCE SHOW

    Weekdays 5:30AM - 9:00AM on Long Island's #1 For All The Hits, 106.1 BLI! 

    · Join The Conversation!

    Now Trending!

    Hot dog fans may need to look skyward for their next order.

    Oscar Mayer is expanding its WienerFleet this summer by adding a WienerDrone.

    The WienerDrone is the "first unmanned hot dog-carrying aircraft designed for remote location delivery," according to Oscar Mayer

    >> Read more trending news

    Also debuting this summer is the WienerCycle, a three-wheeled moped designed for urban deliveries with a sidecar that doubles as a hot dog warming station, Oscar Mayer said in a news release.

    The WienerDrone and WienerCycle join the iconic Wienermobile, the WienerMini and the WienerRover to help promote Oscar Mayer's recipe overhaul of its hot dog brands. Oscar Mayer claims to be the first national brand to remove all added nitrates and nitrites, by-products and artificial preservatives from its hot dogs.

    Officials told people at Alabama’s Redstone Arsenal to shelter in place after reports Tuesday morning indicated a possible shooter at the U.S. Army installation.

    >> Read more trending news

    Redstone Arsenal officials announced the lockdown on social media around 10:25 a.m. local time.

    The Supreme Court’s decision on Monday to allow portions of President Donald Trump’s executive order banning travel to the Unites States from certain countries to be reinstated has left many unanswered questions. 

    And while the administration can restrict certain groups of people from entering the country beginning as early as Thursday, the answer to what else Trump is legally allowed to do when it comes to immigration may not come until the fall when the justices will hear arguments about the case.

    Here’s what other media outlets are saying about the ruling.

    What the Supreme Court’s travel ban ruling means

    The Washington Post

    “The Supreme Court’s decision to allow portions of President Trump’s travel ban to take effect is a win for the administration, but the impact will be far less severe than President Trump’s initial version of the measure.

    That is because the high court effectively allowed Trump to ban from coming to the United States only citizens of six majority-Muslim countries “who lack any bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.” It also nudged the president to complete his promised review of vetting procedures, which might mean the issue is resolved by the time the court is set to fully consider the ban in its October term.

    For now, if you are not a U.S. citizen and have a relative here, have been hired by a U.S. employer or admitted to an American university, you can still probably get a visa. But if you’re applying cold as a visitor or through the diversity visa program, you probably can’t.”

    Court's travel ban ruling gives Trump a boost, changes media narrative

    Fox News

    “Nine justices delivered a reminder yesterday of why the Supreme Court was such an important campaign issue.

    In allowing key parts of President Trump’s travel ban to take effect, the high court—with help from Trump’s man Neil Gorsuch—upended the conventional wisdom on the case. After all, in agreeing to hear the case in October, the justices could have left the temporary stay in place pending a final ruling.

    Instead, they sent a strong signal to the appellate courts that they had gone too far in blocking the executive order—and enabled the president to claim “a clear victory for our national security.”

    But the court also obliterated the existing media narrative, which is that the travel ban was a badly botched, unconstitutional overreach by Trump.”

    Supreme Court's compromise on travel ban raises big questions for US tourism industry

    Forbes

    “After battling through lower courts, a watered down version of the travel ban was re-instated Monday, following the Supreme Court’s decision to hear appeals on the ban this October. In the meantime, a limited version will be in effect in as little as 72 hours.

    Although President Trump is claiming it as a victory, this iteration is far more limited than the two previous versions. Restricting travel from six majority Muslim countries for 90 days and suspending the country’s refugee program for 120 days, the latest version only effects people without any connections to the US.”

    Trump applauds Supreme Court, feels ‘gratified’ by ruling to revive travel ban

    The Washington Times

    “The Supreme Court revived President Trump’s extreme vetting travel ban Monday, ruling that much of it can go into effect — and along the way delivering an implicit rebuke to the army of lower-court judges who blasted the president as anti-Muslim.

    In a unanimous unsigned ruling, the justices said the president has important national security powers that the courts must respect and ruled that he likely has the power to deny entry to broad categories of would-be visitors and immigrants.

    But the justices said those who already have a connection to the U.S. — either a job offer, an admission to an educational program or a close family connection — will be exempted from the 90-day ban on travel from six countries as well as the 120-day pause on refugees.

    Minutes after the ruling, both sides were fighting over what that meant.”

    Supreme Court ruling on travel ban sparks fear, frustration — and joy — in Southern California

    OC Register

    “Muslim Americans in Southern California described the Supreme Court’s decision Monday to allow a temporary, partial version of the Trump administration’s travel ban as disappointing and “irrational,” but noted that until the issue gets a full hearing later this year it’s unclear how it will play out.

    The ruling was also met with a chorus of bravos from Trump supporters who say it will make America safer, with additional vetting of who gets in and who doesn’t.

    Both sides are gearing up for what’s next.”

    SCOTUS splits the travel ban baby

    Slate

    “The Supreme Court’s ruling on Donald Trump’s travel ban is like an optical illusion: Your perception of it changes depending on your vantage point. To Trump and his allies, the decision looks like total vindication for the administration, a move that allows its long-delayed executive order to take effect. To left-leaning analysts, it’s a clever political compromise that still protects many of the refugees and foreign nationals who would’ve been excluded by the ban.

    There’s a reason for these wildly differing takes: The decision itself is confusing and ambiguous. That’s because the court ruled only on the injunction and thus dodged the central issue: the legality of the order and the president’s authority to pass it. The court’s baby-splitting shields the president and his opponents from an outright loss or a clear-cut victory. But it doesn’t make much sense as a matter of law. It preserves the authority of the Supreme Court to say what the law is—even though, by its own terms, it fails to say what the law is.”

    Danish shipping conglomerate A.P. Moller-Maersk was one of multiple European companies to fall victim Tuesday to a cyberattack as Ukrainian government officials reported a “large-scale hacker attack” across the country.

    >> Read more trending news

    It was not immediately clear whether the attacks were connected. The Associated Press reported that Russia’s Rosneft oil company also reported being hacked Tuesday.

    A Georgia woman could face jail time and a large fine over her garden.

    >> Read more trending news

    Atlanta city code enforcement officers told Lexa King that her flower garden is overgrown.

    King told WSB-TV’s Rikki Klaus that she’s been growing her garden for about 30 years. She beams when she talks about the azaleas in her yard.

    "And since I pay the taxes and since I pay the mortgage and since I pay the insurance, I figure I'm the one that gets to say," King said.

    Code enforcement officers see the situation, and her garden, differently.

    "They said it was messy, said it was overgrown,” King said. "I said, ‘Well, this is a matter of your interpretation.’”

    >> Related: Man plants 2,000 tulips for 45th wedding anniversary

    In December, King said, an anonymous complaint led to an arrest citation. It details "overgrowth" in her yard and said she's violating a city code that prohibits "excessive growth."

    "We asked him for a definition of excessive, which he could not provide," King said.

    Klaus asked King whether she plans to cut the shrubs back.

    "Not unless I'm absolutely forced to," King said.

    King said she's fighting a bigger battle to protect the quirkiness of Atlanta’s Candler Park neighborhood.

    "This is not about me. It's not about those azaleas. This is about our neighborhood and the way of life that we have here," King said.

    Neighbors said they've been writing to City Council members on King's behalf.

    "We're hoping for dismissal of these charges before Lexa King appears in front of the Municipal Court of Atlanta to be sentenced for her crime of azaleas," neighbor Scott Jacobs said.

    Klaus researched the penalties of a court citation. King could face up to 60 days in jail and a $1,000 fine.

    Her hearing will take place in August.

    Klaus contacted code enforcement for reaction to this story. She’s still waiting to get a response. 

    BLI Entertainment Update

    President Donald Trump took to Twitter early Tuesday to sound off after three employees on CNN’s new investigative unit resigned Monday over a retracted online story regarding the Senate’s Russia investigation.

    "Wow, CNN had to retract big story on 'Russia,' with 3 employees forced to resign," he wrote. "What about all the other phony stories they do? FAKE NEWS!"

    He added later: “Fake News CNN is looking at big management changes now that they got caught falsely pushing their phony Russian stories. Ratings way down!”

    He continued: “So they caught Fake News CNN cold, but what about NBC, CBS & ABC? What about the failing @nytimes & @washingtonpost? They are all Fake News!”

    Thomas Frank, a veteran reporter who wrote the story; his editor, Eric Lichtblau, who recently came from the New York Times; and Lex Haris, the man who oversaw the CNN Investigates unit and has worked at CNN since 2001, chose to depart Monday. Frank and Lichtblau worked out of the CNN D.C. bureau; Haris was based in New York.

    A spokesman for CNN said: “In the aftermath of the retraction of a story published on CNN.com, CNN has accepted the resignations of the employees involved in the story’s publication.”

    The story, which linked Anthony Scaramucci, a hedge-fund manager close to Trump, to a Russian investment fund allegedly being investigated by a Senate intelligence committee, did not go through the proper fact-checking process, CNN said. The retracted story cited a single anonymous source.

    >> Read more trending news

    “The story wasn’t solid enough to publish as-is,” one of the people briefed on the investigation told CNN media writer Brian Stelter.

    As The Washington Post noted, this mistake provided right-wing media fodder that feeds into the perception that CNN is improperly going after Trump. Breitbart dubbed the news “Very Fake News” in a headline.

    In the past couple of years, CNN has been aggressively beefing up its investigative forces.

    “CNN needs to be an organization that breaks news, not just an organization that covers breaking news or talks about breaking news on television,” Andrew Morse, the executive vice president of editorial for CNN/U.S. and general manager of CNN digital worldwide, told NPR in January. “There’s no better way to do that than to invest in investigative reporting.”

    – The Cox Media Group National Content Desk contributed to this report.

    After saying he may be stepping away from his popular impressions of the 45th president, Alec Baldwin is now saying he’ll be back portraying Donald Trump on the next season of “Saturday Night Live.”

    >> Read more trending news

    Baldwin told CNN, “Yeah, we’re going to fit that in. I think people have enjoyed it.”

    The 59-year-old actor was in New York City to promote his new movie “Blind.”

    He was also the focus of an upcoming Spike TV roast, which was taped Sunday night. Robert DeNiro, Julianne Moore and Tracy Morgan were among stars and friends who mentioned Baldwin’s impression during their segments of the event, CNN reported. The roast will air on July 9 on Spike.

    Earlier this year, Baldwin said he wasn’t sure if he was going to be back on “SNL” because he thought that the impression was becoming too much for the audience.

    Baldwin has hosted “SNL” a record 17 times. The show has been on the air since 1975.

    Days after Bill Cosby’s representatives said he was planning on touring the country and appearing at town halls to speak with young people about sexual assault, one of those same representatives says that is not the case.

    The Huffington Post reported that on Sunday, Cosby’s representative Ebonee Benson told CNN that the town hall meetings will not be about sexual assault.

    >> Read more trending news

    “I just want to be clear. The town hall meetings are not about sexual assault. I will repeat. These town hall meetings are not about sexual assault,” she told CNN. “This went way beyond a comment made from an interview by my colleague (Andrew Wyatt, another Cosby representative), a day ago.

    Related: Bill Cosby plans town meetings on sexual assault following mistrial

    “When we initially talked about the town hall meetings, it was about restoration of legacy. Much to what Mrs. Cosby spoke on in her statement is the sensationalism brought on by the media,” Benson said. “This is another example of that. To take something that was meant to talk about the restoration of this man’s legacy that was destroyed by the media before he even had a chance to step into the courtroom. That’s what this is about.”

    Benson’s statement comes after Benson and  Wyatt appeared on Good Day Alabama on Wednesday and said that Cosby was planning town halls after a mistrial was declared in a sexual assault case against him from accuser Andrea Constand. 

    “We are now planning town halls. We’ll talk to young people,” Wyatt said on WBRC. “This is bigger than Bill Cosby. This issue can affect any young person, especially young athletes of today. They need to know what they’re facing when they’re hanging out and partying, when they’re doing certain things they shouldn’t be doing. It also affects married men.”

    Related: Bill Cosby accuser slams his upcoming sexual assault town halls

    Wyatt clarified the remarks to The New York Times in an email the next day, saying that Cosby has received “hundreds of calls from civic organizations and churches requesting for Mr. Cosby to speak to young men and women about the judicial system.”

    “These groups would like for Mr. Cosby to share that people in the judicial system can use their powers to annul deals for personal agenda and political ambitions,” he said.

    Wyatt said that the speeches would be free.

    The apparent change of plans comes after one of Cosby’s accusers, Linda Kirkpatrick, appeared on CNN on Saturday and compared Cosby’s town hall to serial killer and sex offender Jeffrey Dahmer, known as the Milwaukee Cannibal, hosting a cooking show.

    “Him having a town hall meeting on educating people about sexual assault is the same as Jeffrey Dahmer hosting a town hall meeting on the joy of cooking, neither of which I will be attending,” Kirkpatrick said.

    Prosecutors said they plan to retry Cosby after the mistrial was declared.

    Track star Alysia Montano competed in the USA Track and Field Outdoor Championship five months into her pregnancy on Thursday.

    Montano clocked 2 minutes 21.4 seconds in the 800 meter at Sacramento State’s Horney Stadium in the 110-degree heat.

    Montano, 31, finished her two laps 19 seconds behind the winning time.

    While Thursday’s event was inspiring, this isn’t the first time Montano competed while pregnant. In 2014, Montano competed in the 800 meter while she was eight months pregnant with her now 3-year-old daughter.

    Montano’s time on Thursday was 11 seconds faster than the first time she ran pregnant.

    “Everyone is like, ‘Oh, you’re going to be faster than you were last time, because you’re less pregnant,” Montano said, according to The Associated Press. “I’m like, ‘I’m still pregnant.’”

    Montano’s personal-best time of 1:57.34 was set in 2010.

    While she already proved a pregnant woman could compete in a track event three years ago, Montano was inspired to compete again on Thursday after learning “Wonder Woman” star Gal Gadot filmed some of her superhero film while pregnant.

    Montano paid tribute to Wonder Woman with her shirt on Thursday.

    “I wanted Wonder Woman to represent me,” Montano said of her top choice, according to Team USA. “When I found out (Gadot) filmed half the movie five months pregnant, I said, ‘I for sure am signing up for USA nationals.’”

    Another athlete, Serena Williams, competed while pregnant. The tennis player said she found out just two days before playing the Australian Open that she was expecting. Williams went on to win the tournament.

    Tempers flared at the BET Awards Sunday night between  members of the Atlanta rap group Migos and interviewer Joe Budden after an abrupt mic-drop end to an interview.

    >> Read more trending news

    Actually, the interview wasn’t going that well even before Budden abruptly bolted. He, DJ Akademiks and Nadeska Alexis were asking what became a contentious line of questioning when Akademiks said Takeoff (Kirshnik Khari Ball), a member of Migos, how he felt about being left off the hit single “Bad and Boujee.”

    >> Related: BET Awards 2017: Red carpet arrivals

    “Do it look like I’m left off ‘Bad and Boujee?'” Takeoff responded.

    The mic drop and walk-off shortly followed and that’s when the storm clouds started gathering, figuratively speaking.

    “Where’s our security guard?” you can hear someone asking in a video of the incident.

    >> Related: Video: Bruno Mars opens 2017 BET Awards

    It seems everyone moved on, though, without further incident.